ABSTRACT
Objective: The main purpose of this study is to characterize and compare the population that received tofacitinib with those that were not treated with the drug for COVID-19 at the Clínica Unión Médica del Norte, in 2020. Methods: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, exploratory, and secondary source study was conducted. A comparison was made between clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, laboratory results and their treatment option. Results: Five hundred and seven patients admitted to the COVID-19 unit of the Clínica Unión Médica del Norte were included. It was determined that lower death rates were registered in the group that received tofacitinib (6.45%) compared to the group that did not use the drug. Likewise, those receiving this therapy required less mechanical ventilation, however, a higher proportion of these patients were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. In addition, a greater reduction in glycaemia was identified in the patients receiving tofacitinib, but they had higher levels of ferritin and D-dimer. Conclusions: Tofacitinib may be beneficial in terms of mortality rates and reduction in the use of mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, it is promising with respect to positive patient progression. However, our research is not conclusive. Future confirmatory research is needed on the efficacy of tofacitinib therapy for COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused tremendous impact globally due to the significant morbidity and mortality caused by this virus. It is currently known that the probability of becoming seriously ill from this disease is higher in older adults, in people with pre-existing comorbidities, and those with a suppressed immune state. Therefore, transplant patients are not the exception. Considering the importance of this topic and the scarce information on the outcome of this type of patient, especially in Latin America, this series of cases is focused on our experience with 10 kidney transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Case Description: The age range of the patients was 41 to 68 years, where 8 of these were men. The most common admission symptoms were fever (80%), dyspnea (70%), myalgia/arthralgia (50%), and headache (50%). The most prevalent laboratory findings were lymphocytopenia and increased inflammatory markers such as D-dimer, LDH, procalcitonin, erythrocyte sedimentation, and ferritin. General management included supportive treatment, statins, and antithrombotic therapy, while the specific treatment options were hydroxychloroquine, antivirals, corticosteroids, intravenous ig, tofacitinib, and convalescent plasma. All the patients improved and were discharged. Two of them went to the ICU and only one required mechanical ventilation. The majority of the patients (70%) remained with their baseline immunosuppression without dose reduction or suspension. Discussion: kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to infections, along with increased disease severity. At the same time their immunosuppressed state may reduce the inflammatory response following this type of infection. Decisions were based on stopping or attenuating the viral load and the systemic inflammation caused by this virus, but at the same time protecting against acute allograft rejection and the coinfection with other pathogens. Our findings suggest that the use of statins and antithrombotic prophylaxis in all hospitalized transplant patients may be beneficial to reduce the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Also, the maintenance of immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with worse outcomes.